MDOT Reveals the Shortlist of Companies Eligible to Bid on the Toll Lane Contract

In September 2017, Governor Larry Hogan proposed adding toll lanes to the Maryland side of the Capital Beltway and to I-270, which would be built and operated by private companies through a public-private-partnership (P3). The Maryland Board of Public Works (BPW) officially designated the project as a P3 in June 2019, allowing the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) to move forward with the contract procurement process.

MDOT has begun the process by seeking proposals from the private sector to add four new toll lanes to lower I-270 and the American Legion Bridge (ALB). The Agency issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for the P3, received Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) responses from four potential bidders, and on July 17, 2020, notified all four proposers that they are on the short list of qualified proposers. Requests for Proposals (RFPs) will only be accepted from vendors on MDOT’s shortlist. 

You’ll find detailed information on each of the four finalists below. But here’s a preview: One of them is responsible for the outrageous tolls in Northern Virginia and has ties to Governor Hogan; another may be connected to the disastrous Purple Line and multiple highway bankruptcies in the U.S.

How It Works

MDOT will choose the contractor. The selected proposer will become the Phase 1 Developer and will be responsible for designing, building, financing, operating, and maintaining managed lanes for a series of sections that make up the entirety of Phase 1. Phase 1 includes the ALB  to the I-270 western spur, and then up I-270 to I-370. MDOT plans to submit the P3 Agreement to the BPW in late spring or early summer 2021.

Action Item

Write Delegate Kumar Barve, Comptroller Peter Franchot, and MDOT Secretary Greg Slater and tell them there must be a delay in the I-495 & I-270 P3 toll lane project. The Managed Lanes decision will affect the region and the State of Maryland for decades. There is no need to complete the project within the previous timeframe since it is unclear what the long-term effects of the pandemic will be on the regional economy and commuting behavior.

MDOT needs to acknowledge the current covid-19 situation and examine whether the plan to widen I-495 and I-270 reflects future needs. After governments imposed community lockdowns to manage the spread of the virus, traffic levels on toll roads were reported to have fallen by 40% -80% in large metropolitan areas in North America. Fewer cars can lead to revenue shortfalls, a significant concern for the I-495 & I-270 P3 project. 

Privatizing state highways can lead to the State’s inability to negotiate any changes should future situations affect the project design or other features of the contract. There must be public and legislative scrutiny of all I-495 & I-270 P3 agreements before the projects are awarded.

The Purple Line P3 Stalemate is a Warning about the I-495 & I-270 P3

The Purple Line P3 is at an impasse because of long-standing disagreements between the private sector and the State over significant delays and cost overruns on the project. Contractors have threatened to quit the project, leaving construction only partially completed. Delays and lawsuits could add years to the project and cost billions of dollars.

On June 22, 2020, the chairs of four transportation and appropriations committees and subcommittees of the Maryland House of Delegates sent a letter to Secretary Slater about the dispute between the State and contractors on the P3 Purple Line project. The letter said the Purple Line P3 situation should serve as a warning of what can happen when critical details and agreements are not worked out.

Furthermore, the Delegates expressed concern that the I-495 and I-270 P3 procurement process is being pushed forward too fast. The letter listed specific information that MDOT needs to obtain from the firms, including a detailed history of the companies, their track record on big-ticket projects worldwide, and how they would handle disputes with the State or their contractors.

Procurement Process

An RFQ is a solicitation that invites bidders to submit a written statement of their interest and expertise for a competitive project. An RFQ issued on February 7, 2020 initiated the procurement process for the toll lane project.

An SOQ is a vendor’s response to the RFQ, outlining their expertise and qualifications and how well they can align their experience to the criteria outlined in the RFQ. MDOT selected all four teams of private companies that submitted SOQs as qualified to apply for the RFP.

An RFP is a document that solicits bids from potential contractors and provides details about the project. The RFP will request pertinent information such as prior experience, company processes, and team members. A draft RFP is scheduled to be released to the shortlisted proposers for discussion of technical and commercial aspects. 

MDOT’s Short List of Proposers     

The four teams of private companies consist of 19 private firms with experience in infrastructure, highways, transportation, engineering, investment and/or asset management. The majority are international firms with headquarters in Australia, Italy, Spain, Canada, France, or the U.K.; however, most have a global network of offices and projects in multiple countries. Many companies have tens of thousands of employees worldwide. 

One of the applicants will be selected and win the contract. MDOT will reimburse the three unsuccessful proposers for their work applying for the RFP. The contracting process is already costing Maryland taxpayers tens of millions of dollars.

The consortia include project developers, equity members, contractors, and designers. The teams and their lead project developers are:

Accelerate Maryland Partners LLC

Lead project developer:  Transurban (USA) Operations, Inc

Transurban is an Australian-owned firm, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. The company builds and operates toll roads and currently has an interest in 16 urban highways in Australia, the United States, and Canada, including a 50-mile network of managed lanes in Northern Virginia. 

It is widely felt that Governor Hogan favors Transurban to receive the contract for the Maryland toll lanes. Transurban donated $25,000 to Governor Hogan’s inaugural committee and spent $162,000 on Maryland lobbyists in a 6 month period in 2019-2020. Governor Hogan even traveled to Australia in September 2019 and met with company leaders and toured a Transurban project.

Moreover, Amanda N. Allen, a former Hogan administration official left her state government position as Director of International Affairs in  January to join Transurban. She is now Government and Community Affairs manager at Transurban North America, based in Tysons, Virginia. According to state records, she registered as a lobbyist within days of joining the company.

Accelerate Maryland Express Partners

Lead project developer: Itinera Infrastructure & Concessions

Itinera, affiliated with Gavio Group, was established in 1938. At the beginning of the 1960s, Itinera became part of the Gavio Group, which is currently one of the largest tolling concessionaires in the world, predominantly in Italy, Brazil, and the United Kingdom. The firm is also active in large-scale infrastructure transportation P3 projects in North America, providing design, construction, finance, and operation and maintenance. Today, Itinera is one of the world’s top infrastructure firms in terms of size and revenues. The Gavio Group is active world-wide with about 10,000 employees.

Capital Express Mobility Partners

Lead project developers:  Cintra Global SE and Meridiam Capital Express  

Cintra is a private sector transportation infrastructure company headquartered in Spain. It began in 1968 when Ferrovial, its parent company, entered the roadway sector with a toll road concession in Spain. Thirty years later, Cintra was established to develop and focus on international highway promotion. In 2004, the firm entered the U.S. market by establishing a U.S. headquarters in Austin, Texas. Cintra has developed and managed 918 miles of highways and other transportation infrastructure in four continents around the world, including 92 miles of managed highways and $10.1 billion investment in the United States. 

Cintra Global has had problems with toll road contracts in the U.S. The firm arranged a 99-year deal to operate an eight-mile roadway linking Chicago arteries but sold the lease as fears of default escalated. Subsequently, in 2016, the company filed for bankruptcy after running up $1.6 billion in debts on a toll road in Texas. Cintra also sold its 75-year lease to run the Indiana Toll Road after declaring bankruptcy. A toll road project in North Carolina is currently past the deadline for completion.

Meridiam is a global investor and asset manager based in Paris, France specializing in developing, financing, and managing long-term public infrastructure projects. Founded in 2005, Meridiam invests in public infrastructure in Europe, North America and Africa. The company manages 6.2 billion Euro of assets and has invested in over 62 transport, building, and public services projects. 

A firm with the name Meridiam leads the $2 billion P3 on Maryland’s light rail Purple Line, but an MDOT spokesperson would not confirm whether it is the same company. The Purple Line private consortium, of which Meridiam is a partner, has threatened to walk away from the partially built project in a dispute with MDOT about cost overruns.

Potomac Mobility Group

Lead project developer:  ACS Infrastructure Group

ACS, Actividades de Construcción y Servicios, S.A., is a worldwide transportation developer in construction and services activities headquartered in Madrid, Spain. The company was founded in 1997 through the merger of OCP Construcciones, S.A. and Ginés Navarro Construcciones, S.A. As a result of numerous mergers and takeovers, the ACS Group has over 162,000 employees, a presence in over 50 countries and annual net sales in 2012 of approximately $50 billion. The ACS Group, ACS Infrastructure Development, Inc., is the North American subsidiary. Its current infrastructure portfolio includes 28 highway projects.

Update on I-495/I-270 Toll-Lane Plan 

A July presentation to a local civic association described how Governor Hogan is forging ahead with the first part of his plan to add high-priced toll lanes to I-495 and I-270. The talk described new developments and ways that activism by our communities, organizations, and government officials can help pause or stop this costly and destructive plan.

MDOT issues 18,000 Page Draft Environmental Impact Report and forges ahead along pre-pandemic timeline

MDOT just released the mandatory Draft Environmenal Impact Study (DEIS) for the I-495 & I-270 toll lane proposal, and it’s a massive document for a massive, $11 billion project. Dontwiden270.org will keep you informed of findings in the DEIS as reviewers search through the 18,000 pages. The following are some initial disturbing findings. Further below, you’ll find MDOT’s DEIS process, reactions to the document, actions you can take, and a look at the federal regulations governing the process:  

  • According to the DEIS, the project will make traffic on I-270 worse, not better. Between the Beltway and I-370, evening rush hour traffic in the un-tolled lanes will be slower with toll lanes than without them (Appendix C page 123).

  • Traffic north of Shady Grove will back up even more, but the DEIS holds back these numbers entirely. The report only includes the numbers for the no-build alternative.

  • The financial analysis reveals that the P3, contrary to what Governor Hogan promised, will likely need to be subsidized by Maryland taxpayers. Per the Washington Post, “Adding toll lanes to Interstate 270 and most of the Capital Beltway in Maryland could require a government subsidy of $482 million to $1 billion...”

  • The financial analysis doesn't include the $2 billion cost to move water and sewer pipes. 

MDOT’s Process in a Nutshell

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) serve as the project sponsor and joint lead agency for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities for the I-495 & I-270 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Program. These NEPA activities include developing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for expanding I-270 and I-495 for privatized toll lanes. 

A draft EIS (DEIS) was released for public comment on July 10, 2020. The DEIS is 350 pages long plus 17,560 pages of technical documents. It can be searched at View the DEIS Online or hard copies are available for review at these locations and times. The DEIS includes traffic, environmental, engineering, and financial analyses of a No Build alternative as well as six Build alternatives with price-managed toll lanes. It outlines the effects of the project on our air, water, communities, schools, parks, noise levels, traffic and so much more. 

There will be 4 virtual and 2 in-person public hearings scheduled for late August and early September. The locations and dates/times for the hearings, as well as instructions for providing testimony can be found at Information about Public Hearings

TAKE ACTION

The environmental impacts of highway expansion can be extensive and diverse, including the impact on air quality, climate change, storm water facilities, flood plains and wetlands, parks, and public and private properties. The environmental effects on quality of life issues such as health outcomes and noise pollution must also be determined. It is important to become familiar with the DEIS and reviewer assessments and provide comments to MDOT and government officials.

Stay Informed

Write Letters to Government Officials

Write FHWA Environmental Program Manager Jeanette Mar and MDOT Secretary Greg Slater and tell them to extend the DEIS comment period to allow Maryland residents to actively participate in the consequential decisions related to the I-495 & I-270 Managed Lane Study. The public must be given enough time to review the DEIS analysis, submit comments, and express concerns. Given the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, at least 120 days are necessary to provide sufficient opportunity for public comment. 

Provide Comments on the DEIS

Review the DEIS, reviewer information, and related media commentary. Send comments on the DEIS to MDOT. Information on how to provide comments can be found at Provide Feedback. The public will have only 90 days (July 10 – October 8) to comment on the report.

Sign Up to Help Review the DEIS

Volunteers are needed to review sections of the DEIS and flag problematic issues. Experience is not necessary; you will be provided instructions on how to help. Fill out this interest form to volunteer. 

CONCERNS ABOUT THE DEIS

Community Concerns

Leaders of 44 environmental and community groups signed an open letter to MDOT and the FHWA calling for the comment period to be extended to at least 120 days.

The Maryland Sierra Club: The Sierra Club put out a press release on July 10, 2020 that the sheer size of the DEIS indicates that this project warrants intense scrutiny and that, despite its size, the DEIS does not outline key alternatives such as public transit and better land use planning nor examine telecommuting’s role in reducing congestion. 

Dontwiden270.org: By releasing an 18,000-page DEIS in the middle of a health and fiscal emergency and then failing to provide adequate time for document review, MDOT shows disregard for public input. No one knows what post-pandemic commerce, employment, and traffic patterns will look like -- the entire effort should be paused until the pandemic subsides.

Citizens Against Beltway Expansion (CABE):  The $11 billion I-495/I-270 expansion is too big and will affect too many lives over the next 50 years to accept an 18,000 page DEIS that offers vague assurances that pollution and flood risk won’t increase and parks and communities will be protected. The public needs time to review this draft statement, and MDOT needs to release the secret traffic and revenue studies being used to justify this massive, high-risk project. 

National Parks Conservation Association:  This proposed expansion threatens many national parks without solving the region’s transportation needs. Should this proposal move forward, over 300 acres of local parkland – including valuable green space in an increasingly urban area -- could be paved over. 

Legislative Concerns

Four members of Congress sent a letter to state and federal officials asking for an extension of the DEIS public comment period to at least 120 days to ensure genuine public access and engagement. The Congressmen and Senators pointed out that the DEIS findings indicate significant environmental consequences for diverse constituencies living along a 48 mile corridor, potentially affecting the lives of Maryland residents for generations.

Maryland state legislative leaders on transportation issues sent a letter asking MDOT secretary Greg Slater to consider new approaches to transportation in the state and encourage alternative modes of transportation. The delegates maintain that traffic congestion can be cut without highway expansion.

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC)  

The M-NCPPC is the regional planning agency for Montgomery and Prince George’s County. Its mission is to plan communities and steward natural, cultural, and historic resources. As a Cooperating Agency, M-NCPPC was provided an Administrative draft of the DEIS in January 2020 and subsequently submitted more than 300 specific comments to the draft. In a June 8 memorandum, M-NCPPC staff identified major issues for the Commissioners to consider.

The M-NCPPC full Commission met July 15, 2020 to discuss the DEIS and propose recommendations. A video of the meeting and copies of the slides are available. Based on the discussion, the Commission will submit formal comments to the DEIS. Its findings will be issued to the public. Dontwiden270.org will provide information when the report becomes available.

What Comes After the Comment Period?

  • MDOT will select the preferred alternative. 

  • MDOT will review comments and revise the EIS and issue a final EIS. This is scheduled for spring 2021 but this project has frequently missed deadlines.

  • The process will conclude with a Record of Decision (ROD), which is the decision document issued by the FHWA indicating formal federal approval of the EIS. The ROD will explain the reasons for the project decision and identify the alternative(s) that causes the least damage to the environment based on the information in the EIS. This document authorizes MDOT to proceed with design, land acquisition, and construction.

DEFINITIONS

What is an EIS?    

An EIS is a NEPA document required for all construction projects that can have significant environmental effects. It is a comprehensive report describing the environmental impacts on the physical, cultural, and human environments and plans to mitigate the impacts. The EIS determines compliance with other applicable environmental laws and documents the decision-making process in identifying a selected alternative.

The FHWA issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the I-495 & I-270 Managed Lane Study on March 16, 2018. The intent of this EIS is to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of selected alternatives and a no-build alternative within the specific study scope. It should include a review of existing and future traffic, roadway infrastructure, and  environmental conditions to establish context for the identification of alternatives and assessment of potential impacts. 

What is NEPA?

The NEPA Act of 1969 is a federal environmental law that established processes to evaluate the needs and benefits and the potential environmental impacts arising from a federal action before undertaking any proposed action that may affect the environment. NEPA establishes procedural requirements and requires federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on the environmental impact of the proposed action, any adverse effects, and alternatives to the proposed action. NOTE: On July 15, 2020, the Trump administration announced the scaling back of NEPA. Watch for updates on how this might affect the toll-lane project.

Rockville Mayor and Council Tackle Concerns about I-270 Toll Lane Plan

The City of Rockville will be the most critically affected municipality if I-270 is widened as proposed in the Maryland Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) Traffic Relief Plan.

All land that abuts I-270 in Rockville is developed, including nine Rockville neighborhoods, community institutions, churches, the Rockville Senior Center, and homes, businesses, and parks.

Moreover, the MDOT proposal requires that every bridge and overpass on I-270 in Rockville, including the two bridges the City owns, be rebuilt.

Reconstructing the bridges would be expensive and involve years of construction, detours, noise, pollution, and additional traffic on already congested secondary roadways.

For all these reasons, the I-270 proposal was a key agenda item at the Rockville Mayor and Council meeting on June 1, 2020. 

Concerns and More Concerns at the June 1 Meeting 

The Mayor and Council first heard testimony from multiple advocacy groups opposed to the I-270 toll lane plan, including DontWiden270.org (see testimony summaries and links, below). 

Then the Mayor and Council received an update from City Department of Transportation staff on the I-495 and I-270 project. The Council expressed serious concerns that they have not been consulted by MDOT on issues that affect the City. The discussion led to a unanimous vote to send a letter to MDOT and other officials expressing concern about the project’s many impacts on Rockville properties.

You can view a video of the meeting (click on Mayor and Council meetings June 1; the presentation begins at time 1:15:00 and the Council discussion begins at time 1:30:00). You can also read the Mayor and Council’s previous letters of concern to MDOT (see pages 41-45 of the document).

TAKE ACTION

If you’re a Rockville resident, let Mayor Bridget Donnell Newton and the City Council know at mayorcouncil@rockvillemd.gov that you expect them to make opposition to the current I-270 toll lane proposal an ongoing top priority.

The City must also insist that decisions about I-270 be made between Rockville and MDOT through consultation, information sharing, and consensus. Issues to be considered include floodplain analysis, forest conservation, traffic on city streets, maintenance of city bridges, utility relocation, and noise barriers as well as any impact on public or private land. 

What the Advocacy Groups Told the Mayor and Council

Representatives of four advocacy groups—Don't Widen 270, Citizens Against Beltway Expansion, Maryland Sierra Club, Maryland Transit Opportunities Coalition—presented testimony at the June 1 Council meeting about the toll lane project and its risk to the environment and the State’s financial well-being. Here are summaries and links to their full testimony:

Dontwiden270.org

  • Dontwiden270.org urged the City of Rockville to call on the Governor and the Secretary of Transportation to pause the toll-lane project during the Covid-19 pandemic. No one knows what post-pandemic commerce, employment, and traffic patterns will look like. All of the current project’s key financials, including the expected tolls, are based on assumptions and projections that no longer apply. The project needs to be reassessed after the pandemic subsides or stabilizes.

  • The complete DW270 testimony is here.

Citizens Against Beltway Expansion (CABE)

  • CABE stated its skepticism that the current plan can deliver less congestion at no cost to taxpayers or the general public over the 50 year contract period. Private sector traffic and revenue projections often prove over-optimistic, requiring considerable public support when revenues fall short. CABE urged the City to demand there be revised revenue and traffic projections that would be independently analyzed to identify taxpayer liabilities.

  • The complete  CABE testimony is here.

Maryland Sierra Club

  • The Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club addressed environmental concerns regarding the toll-lane project and asked the City to submit comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) as soon as it is released for publication. The toll lane project can have serious environmental impact on city lands, facilities, and private properties. The Sierra Club also requested that the City call for an adequate comment period to review the DEIS.

  • The complete  MD Sierra Club testimony is here.

Maryland Transit Opportunities Coalition (MTOC)

  • It is widely felt that Governor Hogan favors Transurban, an Australian company that holds public-private partnership (P3) toll lane contracts in Virginia, to receive the contract for the Maryland toll lanes. Governor Hogan even traveled to Australia in September 2019 and met with company leaders. Moreover, his Director of Intergovernmental Affairs recently resigned from Maryland state employment to become Transurban’s Maryland Government Affairs Manager.

  • The complete MTOC testimony is here.

Mayor and Council Letter to MDOT

A letter  from the Rockville Mayor and City Council is being sent to MDOT expressing concern about the project, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related uncertainties. The City is requesting that MDOT put a pause on the project and process until a new purpose and need is defined.

The letter states that it is not responsible to continue spending taxpayers’ money on preliminary design, environmental studies, and hiring a developer while the country is facing significant economic changes due to the pandemic. 

The letter also requests specific action items concerning the current process:

  • There should be a 90 day time period for the public to review the DEIS 

  • The City of Rockville would like to be involved in the RFP prepared by MDOT to ensure that all concerns voiced by Rockville are included

  • Transit must be included as a key project element

  • The Mayor and Council urge MDOT to protect the homes, businesses, and infrastructure of the Rockville neighborhoods that abut I-270 

The letter will be posted on the Dontwiden270.org website as soon as it becomes publicly available.