Urge Delegate Barve to Support Legislation to Block Widening I-270

Governor Hogan is rushing ahead with an ill-conceived, wasteful and counter-productive $9-$11 billion plan to widen I-270 –putting homes, neighborhoods and businesses near the highway at risk of getting paved over.

A bill now before the legislature, HB 102, would forbid construction of new toll roads unless they are approved by a majority of the counties they pass through. This bill would give Montgomery County residents a real voice in transportation decisions that affect us and help us create a balanced transportation system that provides good transit alternatives to our ever-crowded highways.

Delegate Kumar Barve, who represents Rockville and Gaithersburg (District 17), is chairman of the Transportation and Environment Committee of the Maryland House of Delegates. HB 102 is coming before Del. Barve’s committee soon.

Click here to tell Delegate Barve you want him to support HB 102.

(Rockville or Gaithersburg - District 17 - residents only, please - we don’t want to send Delegate Barve names of people he doesn’t represent! If you want to urge your own legislators to support the bill, you can find out who represents you here.)

Hogan Admin Backs Away from Promises That Highway Projects Won't Take Homes

In Committee Hearing, Secretary Rahn Refuses to Guarantee Highway Projects Won’t Take Homes, Stay within Existing Right-of-Way

On Tuesday, Maryland Transportation Secretary Pete Rahn undermined months of his and Governor Hogan’s promises that the Governor’s plans for I-270 and I-495 wouldn’t require paving over any homes.

During a joint hearing of the Appropriations and the Environment & Transportation Committees, Rahn allowed for the possibility that the project could require going beyond existing rights-of-way (ROW.) Furthermore, he refused to commit that no homes would be taken, instead saying that MDOT plans to emphasize that desire with prospective bidders for the project.

Rahn’s new statements stand in contrast to what he told Montgomery County elected officials during his Department’s “Road Show” in Rockville in October. As MyMCMedia reported, Rahn told elected representatives from Montgomery County that “The improvements can be done within existing right-of-way without having to take anyone’s home,” Rahn said. “The answer is no, we’re not going to take your home.”

In fact, Rahn had to stress this point under questioning by Senator Cheryl Kagan, who pressed him on the issue. Bethesda Magazine captured the exchange:

“But state Sen. Cheryl Kagan, a Democrat who represents Rockville, wasn’t convinced, when a few minutes later, Rahn said there were “no plans” to raze any homes.

“Mr. secretary, I’m a word nerd. I just want to clarify something. Earlier you said ‘we will not.’ Just now you said ‘we have no plans.’ Plans can change,” she said.

Rahn than reassured Kagan definitively that no homes would be taken.”

The Hogan administration’s promises were first recorded and shared publicly Labor Day, when Gov Hogan made that promise to me during the Gaithersburg Labor Day parade and repeated it to news outlets WTOP and MyMCMedia shortly afterward.

Yet, during a legislative hearing in Annapolis, Secretary Rahn backpedaled and said something quite different to the legislators in the hearing. When asked about staying within existing right-of-way and impacts on homes, Rahn said MDOT “can learn from the private sector what they are viewing as how they will address the very difficult task of placing roads and bridges within this corridor and not having to take homes, not going beyond existing Right-of-Way unless it is absolutely positively necessary.” (Video of the hearing is posted here; Secretary Rahn’s comment occurs at 1:09:40.)

Well that clears things up. Secretary Rahn and the Governor have actually been promising to the public and elected officials that they’ll only take away homes if it is absolutely positively necessary? Based on the judgment of a private contractor who has no accountability to voters and residents? Even his use of the powerful double adverb doesn’t provide all that much assurance.

That wasn’t all. In response to questions about rights-of-way, eminent domain and homes from Delegate Marvin Holmes (District 23B, Prince George’s County), Secretary Rahn would only go so far as to say “Our direction to the P3 proposers will be that we stay within existing right of way would be #1 preferred; and #2 if we were to have to go [beyond the right of way] that no homes will be taken. So we’re being very specific that we don’t want to impact homes. I don’t believe we’re going to have to use eminent domain.” (Video of the hearing is posted here; Secretary Rahn’s comment occurs at 1:27:45.)

That doesn’t sound like much of a promise, or a guarantee. Clearly, while Hogan and Rahn have been telling some elected officials and citizens that they will definitely stay within existing rights-of-way and no homes will be taken, that isn’t what they are telling P3 proposers (in fact, by saying the state will direct P3 proposers, Rahn makes it sound as though MDOT hasn’t yet told prospective bidders about his ROW and no homes taken pledges.) And obviously not what they tell legislators when in the formal setting of a legislative hearing.

HB-91 would require the State to finish the formal process of analyzing the options for a project before moving ahead to solicit bids. If adopted, it would mean that lawmakers would have much more information about projects they are supposed to review before bids are solicited and contracts written - such as what the project is, what it would cost, how it would affect surrounding neighborhoods, the environment, and various risks and benefits to the state.

Citizens Against Beltway Expansion (CABE), the Maryland Transit Opportunities Coalition (MTOC) the Southern Alliance for Rapid Transit (SMRT) and MD Sierra Club testified in support of HB-91. MTOC worked in an endorsement of HB-102 which would give counties a say over whether toll roads can be built within their limits.

DontWiden270.org encourages all concerned citizens to contact their Maryland Legislators and urge their support for HB-91 and other bills such as HB-102 which would both protect homeowners from the Governor’s current highway plans and require a more thorough and thoughtful process before privately-funded projects can leap ahead without sufficient public review and input. We’ve got a running list of such bills here; and you can find out who your Representatives are here.

 

 

Round-up of Proposed Legislation Concerning Hogan's I-270 / I-495 Plans

Issue Background:

Governor Hogan announced a public-private partnership (P3) in September 2017 to address congestion on I-270 and I-495. The proposed P3 Program would include developments on over 70 miles of I-495 and I-270 in Maryland; some of the options include widening I-270 by as many as four lanes.

In addition to putting homes and neighborhoods at risk, the transportation sector is the largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Maryland passed the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act of 2016 to reduce statewide greenhouse gas emissions by 25% from 2006 levels by 2020 and by 40% from 2006 levels by 2030. To comply with this regulation, a bill is being proposed that would require a greenhouse gas emissions study for every major highway project in the State.

Support Pending Bills to Protect Our Homes and Neighborhoods from Governor Hogan’s Highway Plan. Contact your Maryland legislators (each of us are represented by 3 Delegates and 1 Senator) and urge them to support the following bills:

 HB-102: “Toll Roads, Highways, and Bridges – County Government Consent Requirement - Expansion”. Delegate Brooke Lierman (District 46, Baltimore City) introduced HB-102 on January 18, 2019 along with 21 co-sponsors from 7 counties. The bill would expand to all counties in the State a prohibition on State agencies constructing a toll road, highway, or bridge without the consent of a majority of the affected counties. This would give Montgomery County residents more of a say about Hogan’s plan. The bill is currently in the House Environment and Transportation Committee for a first reading.

HB-91: “Public-Private Partnerships – Presentation Reports – Environmental Impact Statement Requirement”. HB-91 was sponsored by Delegates Al Carr (District 18, Montgomery County) and Marc Korman, (District 16, Montgomery County). The bill was prompted because the Hogan administration is attempting to rush the I-270/I-495 schedule by getting approval to solicit bids on the project even before the environmental review is complete, which means lawmakers would essentially be allowing a $9 to $11 billion check to be written without knowing what they are getting. If adopted, the Hogan administration would have to complete the process of weighing all 15 alternatives for the project before resubmitting the pre-solicitation report.

This bill would apply to all P3 projects, including the current highway proposal and any that come after. The House Appropriations and Environment Committee and the House Transportation Committee meeting held a joint hearing on the bill on January 22, 2019. The bill will now go before the full House of Delegates. If it passes, it will be sent to a Senate committee and then to the full Senate. It will then go to Governor Hogan to sign. If he vetoes it, the bill will go back to the full Legislature, where if there are enough votes, the veto will be overridden.

Additional bills in development:

Vaughn Stewart bill: “Transportation Climate Accountability Act of 2019” 

Delegate Vaughn Stewart (District 19, Montgomery County) plans to sponsor a bill that would require the State to clearly and explicitly measure the greenhouse gas emissions, other air pollution, and impact on water quality that would result from proposed large transportation project investments. Read more.

Sara Love bill 

Delegate Sara Love (District 16, Montgomery County) plans to introduce a bill that would codify Governor Hogan’s promise to protect homes.  It’s modeled after a law that was passed to protect homes during the Red Line expansion.

 

 

 

DontWiden270 Bulletin Vol. 1, No. 1 - January 2019

DontWiden270 Bulletin
Volume 1, Number 1
January 2019

 


Welcome to the first issue of DontWiden270’s Bulletin to share current information on Governor Larry Hogan’s I-495 & I-270 P3 Program with individuals and communities along the I-270 corridor.

Hot News: 
State Senator Cheryl Kagan and Delegate Kumar Barve discussed their opposition to widening the footprint of I-270 in the Rockville area during the District 17 send-off event on Sunday, January 6th to discuss legislative priorities. Check out video of the whole event, or some of Senator Kagan’s and Delegate Barve’s remarks on the issue.

 

Senator Kagan and Delegate-elect Palakovich-Carr wore DontWiden270 badges during the District 17 send-off event on January 6th.

Issue Background:

Governor Hogan announced this public-private partnership (P3) in September 2017 to address congestion on I-270 and I-495. The proposed P3 Program would include developments on over 70 miles of I-495 and I-270 in Maryland; some of the options include widening I-270 by as many as four lanes. Not only would this devastate the neighborhoods where homes could be paved over to make room for additional lanes, studies repeatedly show that widening highways is ineffective at addressing congestion long-term. This P3 Program does not seriously consider other options, such as mass transit.
 
Volunteers Needed:
Want to help ensure our homes and neighborhoods are protected from Governor Hogan’s highway plans? We need you! DontWiden270.org is an all-volunteer effort. If you can help with any of the following, please let us know at dontwiden270@gmail.com:

  • Website updates (posting new information) and website improvements (such as adding capacity that makes it easier for people to take action.)

  • Educating people in your neighborhood about what’s going on.

  • Research to help us better inform the public, media and elected officials. There’s lots to look into and information to organize about the highway planning process, specific proposals the state is continuing to examine, and fact-checking claims and statements about the issue.

  • Identifying opportunities to pressure Governor Hogan, Secretary Rahn and other elected officials to make sure the highway isn’t physically widened.


Recent Events:

  • December 19, 2018:  The Maryland Board of Public Works awarded a $90 million contract to Maryland Traffic Relief Partners to provide comprehensive engineering and support services for the Project. The contract was approved by Governor Hogan and Comptroller Peter Franchot but Treasurer Nancy Kopf abstained stating she remained skeptical about the possible environmental impacts.

  • December 17, 2018:  Maryland State Delegation Bill Hearing. Delegate Al Carr (District 18) presented his bill MC 8-19, which would require authorization from Montgomery County before any state agency could acquire or construct any toll road, highway or bridge in Montgomery County. Eighteen citizens and organizations – including DontWiden270.org founder Pete Altman testified in support of the bill; five people, including some tied to the road building lobby, testified against the bill. A subcommittee of the Maryland House Environment and  Transportation Committee will meet January 15th to discuss the bill.

  • December 13/14, 2018:  The Maryland Department of Transportation(MDOT) presented a Business Project Plan at an international industry forum and held one-on-one meetings with potential concessionaires and contractors interested in the P3 Program. 

  • December 11, 2018:  MDOT submitted a Pre-Solicitation Information Report to the Board of Public Works to hire a private firm to design, build, operate and maintain toll roads on I-495 and I-270. MDOT is currently considering delivering the P3 Program as a series of long-term design-build-finance-operate-maintain revenue risk concessions. Each concession would encompass a portion of the I-495 and I-270 P3 Program and be solicited in phases. MDOT’s estimate for the Project has increased from $9 billion to $11 billion.


Ongoing Activities:

The M-NCPPC report also expressed concern that the Managed Lanes Study Area encompasses many sensitive environmental features and any build alternative that accommodates lane expansion along the existing highway network will significantly alter or completely eliminate the functionality of these environmental features.
 
Looking Ahead:

  • February 2019:  MDOT to release “Alternatives Retained for Detailed Study” (ARDS), which will identify the selected designs for toll lanes or alternatives.

  • Spring 2019:  MDOT expects to identify its Preferred Alternative.

  • Fall 2020:  A final EIS and Record of Determination will be released by MDOT.

  • Public workshops are planned for Winter 2019 to present the Screened Alternatives and detailed analysis.


What You Can Do:
Our homes and neighborhoods are threatened by Governor Hogan’s plan to widen I-270 and I-495. State officials have repeatedly provided conflicting and evasive responses to public inquiries. Our representatives in the Maryland General Assembly need to hear from you. There are many issues for Legislators during the 90-day session, and we need to make sure Governor Hogan’s highway project is at the top of their list. Maryland's 17th district (sections of Rockville and Gaithersburg) is represented by Senator Cheryl Kagan and Delegates Kumar BarveJim Gilchrist, and Julie Palakovich Carr.  Refer to the list of legislators by County and District for other legislative districts. Please contact your State representatives and let them know how critical it is that they make this issue a priority in the current legislative session, which begins January 14th.
 
Show support for the City of Rockville Mayor and Council, who have vigorously advocated for Rockville property owners. The December 30th  Rockville Reports lists under priorities approved by the Mayor and Council, ensuring  that no Rockville homes, businesses or infrastructure are taken by the proposed project to widen I-270.
 
Please share information about DontWiden270 with friends and neighbors who live along the I-270 corridor and Citizens Against Beltway Extension (CABE) for those who live along I-495. Ask them to join the mailing lists and stay informed.
 
Contact DontWiden270@gmail.com if you have questions or comments on the issues presented in this newsletter.

Should 270 Widening Be A Priority for State Legislators?

Our homes and neighborhoods are still threatened by Governor Hogan’s plan to widen I-270 and I-495. We’re going to keep the pressure on the Governor, but its time to let our representatives in the State Legislature know that we need them to make this issue a priority in January, when the next legislative session begins.

They need to hear from you. There are a lot of issue for Legislators during the 90-day session, and we need to make sure Hogan’s highway project is at the top of their list.

That’s why your voice will matter so much at the public hearing on Wednesday, Nov 14 at 7pm. The entire Montgomery County delegation will be there to hear the public’s reaction to the State’s Transportation plans, including Hogan’s plan for I-270 and I-495.

Here are the details:

When: Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 7PM.

Where: 3rd Floor Hearing Room, Stella Werner Council Office Bldg., 100 Maryland Ave., Rockville, MD 20850. Need a map or directions?

What to do:

  1. Sign up to speak at the hearing. It's the single most important thing you can do to make sure our legislators prioritize this. Tell Legislators to protect our homes and neighborhoods from Governor Hogan’s highway plan. You must sign-up by noon on Nov 14th. Speaking slots are two minutes long. You can sign-up online, or you may call 410-841-3010 or 301-858-3010, or e-mail saha@mlis.state.md.us - before Noon on the 14th!

    Need some help with what to say? Here’s a guide on what to say and helpful points to make:

  2. Show up! Even if you don’t speak, being there shows you care.

  3. Bring a sign! Make your own or print one out. Just make sure its no bigger than a regular letter-size (8.5 x 11 inches.)

MDOT Secretary Rahn Misleads, Dodges in Response to Local Officials

In a letter dated October 19, 2018, Secretary Rahn resorts to misleading characterizations of federal law and dodging responsibility rather than guarantee local officials that Governor Hogan’s plans for I-270 and I-495 won’t require destruction of nearby homes and property.

The letter, a response to a written request from Rockville Mayor and City Council for the Governor to “commit his intentions [that no homes will be torn down] in writing,” does little to address concerns of residents near the highways.

While the Governor and Secretary have clearly become sensitized to concerns about the project’s potential to affect adjacent properties, and while they have both now made verbal promises that no homes will be affected by the project, Rahn’s letter falls short of making any binding commitments to ensure that outcome.

Secretary Rahn’s letter, while striving to sound as though the possibility of taking homes has been ruled out, does not actually contain any binding commitments to make that a certainty. In fact, the letter shrinks back from providing that guarantee. It is also disturbing that letter offers misleading characterizations of the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act in order to justify continuing to examine options which could result in taking homes and property, and to provide an excuse for why the State declines to remove those options from consideration.

Here are DontWiden270.org’s chief concerns with Secretary Rahn’s letter:

1.     Secretary Rahn variously describes MDOT’s intention to avoid affecting adjacent properties as “our approach” and “strategic objectives”; and describes that it is “looking to implement” changes within the existing right-of-way. Yet approaches, objectives and intended implementations change with major projects such as these and the use of such terms in a letter can hardly be construed as a binding commitment.

It is also worth pointing out that MDOT has been saying for some time that minimizing impacts to adjoining properties is a goal – for example, in this RFP for technical support on the project – but has not taken the steps available to ensure no homes are taken, such as ruling the option out in materials for bidders.  

2.     Secretary Rahn’s stated intention to keep the project within the existing rights-of-way and treat sound barriers as immovable boundaries for the project is encouraging. But it isn’t really clear that MDOT is acting in a manner consistent with Secretary Rahn’s assurances. In a presentation to potential bidders on December 13th, 2017, MDOT poses the question “Right-of-way acquisition – retained by MDOT or transferred? Who assumes cost risk?”  Why would MDOT need to think about this if there was no way the project would extend beyond existing rights of way?

3.     Secretary Rahn’s letter cites the National Environmental Policy Action (NEPA) to imply first that federal law requires MDOT to study alternatives which could require taking homes and property, and second that the law prohibits MDOT from removing options from consideration before the process is complete.

Both implications are based on a serious misrepresentation of what NEPA actually requires. First, according to the Federal Highway Administration (FWHA), the NEPA decision-making process on highway projects does not require looking at “all” options as Secretary Rahn suggests, but a range of alternatives to the proposed action the state has put forward. To quote FWHA, the first two principal elements required are:

  • “Assessment of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of a proposed action or project” (such as a proposal to add two to four lanes to a highway); and

  • “Analysis of a range of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project, based on the applicants defined purpose and need for the project.”

Under NEPA, the State must assess the impacts of the proposed project and a range of reasonable alternatives to it. However, NEPA does not require the State to assess the impacts of any specific options the State is not considering (other than the “no build” option in which the state does nothing.) The only reason NEPA requires the State to assess the impacts of widening the highways by two or four lanes is because those are projects the State is considering. If the State were not considering them, it would not be obligated to assess their impacts. 

Furthermore, the Secretary's claim that "We cannot commit to any alternative until we fully and objectively evaluate the reasonable alternatives as it would violate federal NEPA requirements" appears to imply the State cannot provide the guarantee that the City of Rockville and residents are seeking, lest it violate federal law. This is rubbish. While it is true that the State cannot leapfrog the process and commit to a specific plan without completing the process, there is nothing under NEPA to prevent it from removing some options from consideration (other than the "no-build" option.)

In short, NEPA does not prevent the State from committing to reject any proposals which would involve taking homes or property. 

It is somewhat disheartening that the Secretary of Transportation would attempt to hide behind a mischaracterization of a federal law in order to justify refusing to guarantee the I-270 and I-495 project will not require taking of homes, businesses or property, or that MDOT’s understanding of the law is so poor that it doesn’t realize what the law requires and allows. But it confirms our conviction that a binding commitment is still necessary in order to put Rockville residents’ minds at ease on the question of widening the highway.

The sum of these concerns boils down to one simple question: if the Governor and Secretary are so confident that the project will not affect any homes, business or property, why do they continue to refuse to commit to it? The Governor could issue a binding directive to MDOT requiring it to consider only those proposals which have no impact on surround properties. Given that this P3 project is under the authority of the Governor, it is within his purview to simply rule out the possibility of property impacts.

Please join us in urging Governor Hogan to back up his promises by putting them in writing. Sign the petition here.

 

Governor Hogan: Promises Won't Protect Our Homes

An open letter...

The Honorable Governor Larry Hogan
100 State Circle
Annapolis, Maryland
21401-1925

Dear Governor Hogan,

Thank you for speaking with me at the Gaithersburg Labor Day Parade about the I-270 and I-495 project. I was very encouraged to hear you say that “Not a single house is ever gonna be taken down” to make room for widening of the highways. I was further encouraged that you repeated the sentiment to news organizations WTOP and www.mymcmedia.org/.  

However, the official documents and statements from your Administration, specifically the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) and the State Highway Administration (SHA), leave wide open the possibility that private property could be seized and homes paved over.

A slide presented to project bidders during a December 13, 2017 “Industry Forum” highlighted the question of who assumes the cost risks of “Right-of-way acquisition.” MDOT explains this as the process of seizing property, assessing its value, negotiating over compensation and relocation. Clearly from the State’s perspective, “right-of-way” acquisition includes the taking of private property to make room for transportation projects. How do we know that this won't be used to take homes? 

Even the statement issued by SHA on Tuesday, September 4th in response to questions about your “Not one single house is ever gonna be taken down” undercuts your promise. The SHA statement says that the state’s “approach” is to develop options “within the existing right-of-way.” The statement does not rule out property seizures or paving over homes, since it characterizes the state’s position as an “approach” which does not guarantee that’s what will happen. In addition, if the state’s intention is to stay within the right-of-way, why has right-of-way acquisition been a topic it has needed to discuss with bidders, and why is it so important to figure out “who assumes the cost risk?”

Governor Hogan, promises won't protect our homes. If you mean what are saying, make it official: direct MDOT and the SHA to inform bidders that proposals that involve seizing property or tearing down or moving existing homes will not be considered. 

Thank you for your time and attention, and please reply to let me know what you plan to do.

Peter Altman
(street address withheld from web version)
Rockville MD 20850

Governor Hogan Responds to I-270, I-495 Protesters Worried About Homes

A big concern of those living near I-270 and I-495 is the prospect homes and neighborhoods being paved over to make room for Governor Hogan's huge highway project. The Governor proposes adding as many as four lanes to both highways. This has a lot of local residents anxious about the impacts on their homes, neighborhoods and communities, since widening the highways, which run right up against neighborhoods and property lines, would seem to require taking down homes to make room for more lanes. 

And according to the Montgomery County Planning Committee, the State's "Managed Lanes Study Area" will ultimately evaluate properties and resources within approximately 300 feet of the existing I-495 and I-270 highway centerline, which certainly suggests that, in the end, stuff would have to be moved out of the way. 

So protestors from neighborhoods next to and near I-495 and I-270 arranged themselves along the Labor Day Parade routes in Kensington and Gaithersburg MD. I had a chance to ask the Governor about the risk to homes along the highways. Here's the video (apologies for the very out-of-frame cinematography here): 

While we're glad that the Governor told a protester this in the middle of a parade, we'll all feel a lot more secure in our homes' and neighborhoods future if he would issue a formal statement saying so, and making clear to bidders on the project that they will not be able to use eminent domain to seize property. Because as these maps show, there are a lot of homes in the "Study Area". Then we'll all be able to relax.