MDOT issues 18,000 Page Draft Environmental Impact Report and forges ahead along pre-pandemic timeline

MDOT just released the mandatory Draft Environmenal Impact Study (DEIS) for the I-495 & I-270 toll lane proposal, and it’s a massive document for a massive, $11 billion project. Dontwiden270.org will keep you informed of findings in the DEIS as reviewers search through the 18,000 pages. The following are some initial disturbing findings. Further below, you’ll find MDOT’s DEIS process, reactions to the document, actions you can take, and a look at the federal regulations governing the process:  

  • According to the DEIS, the project will make traffic on I-270 worse, not better. Between the Beltway and I-370, evening rush hour traffic in the un-tolled lanes will be slower with toll lanes than without them (Appendix C page 123).

  • Traffic north of Shady Grove will back up even more, but the DEIS holds back these numbers entirely. The report only includes the numbers for the no-build alternative.

  • The financial analysis reveals that the P3, contrary to what Governor Hogan promised, will likely need to be subsidized by Maryland taxpayers. Per the Washington Post, “Adding toll lanes to Interstate 270 and most of the Capital Beltway in Maryland could require a government subsidy of $482 million to $1 billion...”

  • The financial analysis doesn't include the $2 billion cost to move water and sewer pipes. 

MDOT’s Process in a Nutshell

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) serve as the project sponsor and joint lead agency for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities for the I-495 & I-270 Public-Private Partnership (P3) Program. These NEPA activities include developing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate environmental impacts of proposed alternatives for expanding I-270 and I-495 for privatized toll lanes. 

A draft EIS (DEIS) was released for public comment on July 10, 2020. The DEIS is 350 pages long plus 17,560 pages of technical documents. It can be searched at View the DEIS Online or hard copies are available for review at these locations and times. The DEIS includes traffic, environmental, engineering, and financial analyses of a No Build alternative as well as six Build alternatives with price-managed toll lanes. It outlines the effects of the project on our air, water, communities, schools, parks, noise levels, traffic and so much more. 

There will be 4 virtual and 2 in-person public hearings scheduled for late August and early September. The locations and dates/times for the hearings, as well as instructions for providing testimony can be found at Information about Public Hearings

TAKE ACTION

The environmental impacts of highway expansion can be extensive and diverse, including the impact on air quality, climate change, storm water facilities, flood plains and wetlands, parks, and public and private properties. The environmental effects on quality of life issues such as health outcomes and noise pollution must also be determined. It is important to become familiar with the DEIS and reviewer assessments and provide comments to MDOT and government officials.

Stay Informed

Write Letters to Government Officials

Write FHWA Environmental Program Manager Jeanette Mar and MDOT Secretary Greg Slater and tell them to extend the DEIS comment period to allow Maryland residents to actively participate in the consequential decisions related to the I-495 & I-270 Managed Lane Study. The public must be given enough time to review the DEIS analysis, submit comments, and express concerns. Given the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, at least 120 days are necessary to provide sufficient opportunity for public comment. 

Provide Comments on the DEIS

Review the DEIS, reviewer information, and related media commentary. Send comments on the DEIS to MDOT. Information on how to provide comments can be found at Provide Feedback. The public will have only 90 days (July 10 – October 8) to comment on the report.

Sign Up to Help Review the DEIS

Volunteers are needed to review sections of the DEIS and flag problematic issues. Experience is not necessary; you will be provided instructions on how to help. Fill out this interest form to volunteer. 

CONCERNS ABOUT THE DEIS

Community Concerns

Leaders of 44 environmental and community groups signed an open letter to MDOT and the FHWA calling for the comment period to be extended to at least 120 days.

The Maryland Sierra Club: The Sierra Club put out a press release on July 10, 2020 that the sheer size of the DEIS indicates that this project warrants intense scrutiny and that, despite its size, the DEIS does not outline key alternatives such as public transit and better land use planning nor examine telecommuting’s role in reducing congestion. 

Dontwiden270.org: By releasing an 18,000-page DEIS in the middle of a health and fiscal emergency and then failing to provide adequate time for document review, MDOT shows disregard for public input. No one knows what post-pandemic commerce, employment, and traffic patterns will look like -- the entire effort should be paused until the pandemic subsides.

Citizens Against Beltway Expansion (CABE):  The $11 billion I-495/I-270 expansion is too big and will affect too many lives over the next 50 years to accept an 18,000 page DEIS that offers vague assurances that pollution and flood risk won’t increase and parks and communities will be protected. The public needs time to review this draft statement, and MDOT needs to release the secret traffic and revenue studies being used to justify this massive, high-risk project. 

National Parks Conservation Association:  This proposed expansion threatens many national parks without solving the region’s transportation needs. Should this proposal move forward, over 300 acres of local parkland – including valuable green space in an increasingly urban area -- could be paved over. 

Legislative Concerns

Four members of Congress sent a letter to state and federal officials asking for an extension of the DEIS public comment period to at least 120 days to ensure genuine public access and engagement. The Congressmen and Senators pointed out that the DEIS findings indicate significant environmental consequences for diverse constituencies living along a 48 mile corridor, potentially affecting the lives of Maryland residents for generations.

Maryland state legislative leaders on transportation issues sent a letter asking MDOT secretary Greg Slater to consider new approaches to transportation in the state and encourage alternative modes of transportation. The delegates maintain that traffic congestion can be cut without highway expansion.

Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC)  

The M-NCPPC is the regional planning agency for Montgomery and Prince George’s County. Its mission is to plan communities and steward natural, cultural, and historic resources. As a Cooperating Agency, M-NCPPC was provided an Administrative draft of the DEIS in January 2020 and subsequently submitted more than 300 specific comments to the draft. In a June 8 memorandum, M-NCPPC staff identified major issues for the Commissioners to consider.

The M-NCPPC full Commission met July 15, 2020 to discuss the DEIS and propose recommendations. A video of the meeting and copies of the slides are available. Based on the discussion, the Commission will submit formal comments to the DEIS. Its findings will be issued to the public. Dontwiden270.org will provide information when the report becomes available.

What Comes After the Comment Period?

  • MDOT will select the preferred alternative. 

  • MDOT will review comments and revise the EIS and issue a final EIS. This is scheduled for spring 2021 but this project has frequently missed deadlines.

  • The process will conclude with a Record of Decision (ROD), which is the decision document issued by the FHWA indicating formal federal approval of the EIS. The ROD will explain the reasons for the project decision and identify the alternative(s) that causes the least damage to the environment based on the information in the EIS. This document authorizes MDOT to proceed with design, land acquisition, and construction.

DEFINITIONS

What is an EIS?    

An EIS is a NEPA document required for all construction projects that can have significant environmental effects. It is a comprehensive report describing the environmental impacts on the physical, cultural, and human environments and plans to mitigate the impacts. The EIS determines compliance with other applicable environmental laws and documents the decision-making process in identifying a selected alternative.

The FHWA issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the I-495 & I-270 Managed Lane Study on March 16, 2018. The intent of this EIS is to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of selected alternatives and a no-build alternative within the specific study scope. It should include a review of existing and future traffic, roadway infrastructure, and  environmental conditions to establish context for the identification of alternatives and assessment of potential impacts. 

What is NEPA?

The NEPA Act of 1969 is a federal environmental law that established processes to evaluate the needs and benefits and the potential environmental impacts arising from a federal action before undertaking any proposed action that may affect the environment. NEPA establishes procedural requirements and requires federal agencies to prepare a detailed statement on the environmental impact of the proposed action, any adverse effects, and alternatives to the proposed action. NOTE: On July 15, 2020, the Trump administration announced the scaling back of NEPA. Watch for updates on how this might affect the toll-lane project.

Rockville Mayor and Council Tackle Concerns about I-270 Toll Lane Plan

The City of Rockville will be the most critically affected municipality if I-270 is widened as proposed in the Maryland Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) Traffic Relief Plan.

All land that abuts I-270 in Rockville is developed, including nine Rockville neighborhoods, community institutions, churches, the Rockville Senior Center, and homes, businesses, and parks.

Moreover, the MDOT proposal requires that every bridge and overpass on I-270 in Rockville, including the two bridges the City owns, be rebuilt.

Reconstructing the bridges would be expensive and involve years of construction, detours, noise, pollution, and additional traffic on already congested secondary roadways.

For all these reasons, the I-270 proposal was a key agenda item at the Rockville Mayor and Council meeting on June 1, 2020. 

Concerns and More Concerns at the June 1 Meeting 

The Mayor and Council first heard testimony from multiple advocacy groups opposed to the I-270 toll lane plan, including DontWiden270.org (see testimony summaries and links, below). 

Then the Mayor and Council received an update from City Department of Transportation staff on the I-495 and I-270 project. The Council expressed serious concerns that they have not been consulted by MDOT on issues that affect the City. The discussion led to a unanimous vote to send a letter to MDOT and other officials expressing concern about the project’s many impacts on Rockville properties.

You can view a video of the meeting (click on Mayor and Council meetings June 1; the presentation begins at time 1:15:00 and the Council discussion begins at time 1:30:00). You can also read the Mayor and Council’s previous letters of concern to MDOT (see pages 41-45 of the document).

TAKE ACTION

If you’re a Rockville resident, let Mayor Bridget Donnell Newton and the City Council know at mayorcouncil@rockvillemd.gov that you expect them to make opposition to the current I-270 toll lane proposal an ongoing top priority.

The City must also insist that decisions about I-270 be made between Rockville and MDOT through consultation, information sharing, and consensus. Issues to be considered include floodplain analysis, forest conservation, traffic on city streets, maintenance of city bridges, utility relocation, and noise barriers as well as any impact on public or private land. 

What the Advocacy Groups Told the Mayor and Council

Representatives of four advocacy groups—Don't Widen 270, Citizens Against Beltway Expansion, Maryland Sierra Club, Maryland Transit Opportunities Coalition—presented testimony at the June 1 Council meeting about the toll lane project and its risk to the environment and the State’s financial well-being. Here are summaries and links to their full testimony:

Dontwiden270.org

  • Dontwiden270.org urged the City of Rockville to call on the Governor and the Secretary of Transportation to pause the toll-lane project during the Covid-19 pandemic. No one knows what post-pandemic commerce, employment, and traffic patterns will look like. All of the current project’s key financials, including the expected tolls, are based on assumptions and projections that no longer apply. The project needs to be reassessed after the pandemic subsides or stabilizes.

  • The complete DW270 testimony is here.

Citizens Against Beltway Expansion (CABE)

  • CABE stated its skepticism that the current plan can deliver less congestion at no cost to taxpayers or the general public over the 50 year contract period. Private sector traffic and revenue projections often prove over-optimistic, requiring considerable public support when revenues fall short. CABE urged the City to demand there be revised revenue and traffic projections that would be independently analyzed to identify taxpayer liabilities.

  • The complete  CABE testimony is here.

Maryland Sierra Club

  • The Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club addressed environmental concerns regarding the toll-lane project and asked the City to submit comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) as soon as it is released for publication. The toll lane project can have serious environmental impact on city lands, facilities, and private properties. The Sierra Club also requested that the City call for an adequate comment period to review the DEIS.

  • The complete  MD Sierra Club testimony is here.

Maryland Transit Opportunities Coalition (MTOC)

  • It is widely felt that Governor Hogan favors Transurban, an Australian company that holds public-private partnership (P3) toll lane contracts in Virginia, to receive the contract for the Maryland toll lanes. Governor Hogan even traveled to Australia in September 2019 and met with company leaders. Moreover, his Director of Intergovernmental Affairs recently resigned from Maryland state employment to become Transurban’s Maryland Government Affairs Manager.

  • The complete MTOC testimony is here.

Mayor and Council Letter to MDOT

A letter  from the Rockville Mayor and City Council is being sent to MDOT expressing concern about the project, especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related uncertainties. The City is requesting that MDOT put a pause on the project and process until a new purpose and need is defined.

The letter states that it is not responsible to continue spending taxpayers’ money on preliminary design, environmental studies, and hiring a developer while the country is facing significant economic changes due to the pandemic. 

The letter also requests specific action items concerning the current process:

  • There should be a 90 day time period for the public to review the DEIS 

  • The City of Rockville would like to be involved in the RFP prepared by MDOT to ensure that all concerns voiced by Rockville are included

  • Transit must be included as a key project element

  • The Mayor and Council urge MDOT to protect the homes, businesses, and infrastructure of the Rockville neighborhoods that abut I-270 

The letter will be posted on the Dontwiden270.org website as soon as it becomes publicly available.

County Governments Just Said NO to Raising Water Bills to Pay for Toll-Lane  Construction

Water rates and toll lanes

On March 12, 2020, a joint meeting of the Transportation and Environment Committee of the Montgomery County Council and the Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy, and Environment Committee of the Prince George’s County Council was held with the Washington Suburban Sanitation Commission (WSSC). At this meeting the WSSC provided a report on possible impacts of the I-270 and I-495 road widening P3 Project on WSSC infrastructure.

WSSC announced that according to a new WSSC utility analysis, the P3 Project would require 70 miles of large water and sewer pipes to be relocated, costing between $1.3 billion and $2 billion, depending on the construction method used. Based on historical data that the Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) and WSSC split the costs, WSSC has estimated its cost to be $1 billion.

In its report to the two county councils, WSSC said some 2 million residents in Montgomery and Prince George’s counties would see added costs to their water bill.

MDOT cost projection

MDOT had originally calculated the costs to relocate water and sewer pipes to be $900 million. This cost estimate greatly underestimates WSSC projections. The utility said the state also hadn’t included $280 million in its estimate to move the 5.3-mile bi-county tunnel, a steel pipe seven feet in diameter that opened in 2015 adjacent to the Beltway. 

Who pays for moving the pipelines?

It is unclear who is required to pay for the cost of any water relocation for the proposed project. A 1958 memorandum of understanding (MOU) between WSSC and the then Maryland State Roads Commission designates who pays to move pipes for road widening projects -- the utility or the Maryland State Highway Administration. It depends on whether each stretch of land first had pipes or a road. This MOU remains in effect. 

However, the agreement does not address highway projects built as a public-private partnership. It is not apparent how the costs will be shared between WSSC, SHA, and a third party under a P3 program.

Promises broken

This huge potential increase in water bills for Montgomery and Prince George’s County residents is a complete surprise. In over two years of testimony and public meetings MDOT never mentioned footing a $2 billion construction bill to move water and sewer mains. Thus, taxpayers will pay for construction costs. This contradicts Governor Hogan's central promise that the toll lanes would be built at no real cost to taxpayers and only toll users would pay for the construction of the road.

MDOT response

MDOT said that it’s too early to determine the costs of relocating utilities because the state hasn’t completed a federally required environmental review of the project, a developer has not yet been chosen, and a contract hasn’t been drafted.

MDOT has not indicated who they expect to cover the costs of water and sewer line relocation. However, they have had meetings with WSSC and are creating a joint working group to address these concerns.

Letter from Montgomery and Prince George’s County Councils

On May 14, 2020, the Montgomery County and Prince George’s County Councils sent a joint letter to MDOT Secretary Slater concerning the potential WSSC rate increase for infrastructure relocation. The Councils are opposed to their residents paying for any related costs. According to the letter, the Councils will not approve any WSSC Water Capital Improvement Program that includes such costs and associated rate increases. The Councils request that MDOT address WSSC’s analysis prior to proceeding with the Managed Lane P3 process.

See: 

ACTION ITEM

Add your voice by writing Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Secretary Greg Slater and stating your agreement with statements from the County Councils’ letter. Tell him to require the concessionaire to pay all related construction costs. WSSC ratepayers should not face significant increases in our water bills to cover the P3-associated costs.

Sample Letter

Dear Secretary Slater:

On March 12, 2020, the Washington Suburban Sanitation Commission (WSSC) told the Montgomery and Prince George’s County Councils that moving water and sewer utilities as part of the I-495 and I-270 toll lane construction could cost as much as $2 billion. That means every WSSC customer in Prince George's and Montgomery Counties could see their water and sewer rates increase to relocate utilities for the Managed Lane P3 project.  

This is unacceptable! Governor Hogan promised that the I-270/I-495 P3 Program would not cost taxpayers a dime. These hidden costs are another reason for the state to not proceed with the proposed project. 

The Montgomery County and Prince George’s County Councils’ letter to you on May 14, 2020 stated that MDOT should ensure that the private concessionaire is aware of cost estimates associated with relocation of water and sewer infrastructure as part of the project and is responsible for paying these costs. The Councils stated that they will not “entertain any Water Capital Improvements Program that includes such costs and associated rate increases.” I commend the County Councils for this response and concur that MDOT must ensure that the concessionaire pay all related construction costs. WSSC ratepayers should not face significant increases in our water bills to cover the P3-associated costs.

With Maryland’s historic budget deficit due to COVID-19, I strongly request that MDOT freeze this project and spend its resources on urgent projects with undisputed value.

Sincerely,

Name

Home address

Watch the House of Delegates webinar with MDOT  

Delegate Marc Korman, Chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Transportation and the Environment, is holding a briefing with the Maryland Department of Transportation to better understand COVID-19's impact on our transportation sector. 

  • Date: Wednesday May 20, 2020 

  • Time: 2:00 p.m.

Where: Virtual Zoom Meeting. More information will be available here prior to the briefing. A livestream link will be made available to the public before the start of the briefing.

Watch the Sierra Club meeting with Montgomery County Department of Transportation 

The Sierra Club, Montgomery County will hold a virtual meeting with Mr. Chris Conklin, Director of the Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT). Mr. Conklin, will share updates regarding the County priorities in regard to public transportation system including improvements to the infrastructure needs/challenges and what the County is doing to further improve the safety, effectiveness and environmental performance of the public transportation system.

  • Date: Monday May 18, 2020 

  • Time: 7:00 pm to 8:30 pm  

  • Where: Virtual Zoom Meeting

RSVP Sierra Club Montgomery County Bi-Monthly Virtual Meeting. You will receive the zoom information one to two days prior to the meeting.

Invite your friends and neighbors to join our e-mail list

This is a great way for them to stay current on what’s happening with the highway project and to learn how they can help fight this boondoggle. Go to https://dontwiden270.org/get-involved to sign up. And check out our website dontwiden270.org for more information. We even have a Spanish language section with translations of key documents.