Fwd: Beltway/I-270 toll lane fight — this isn't the end

This email is being forwarded with permission from The Coalition for Smarter Growth.

------- Forwarded Message -------- 

Subject: Beltway/I-270 toll lane fight — this isn't the end 

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:18:09 -0400 

We're disappointed, but we can't give up

Today, the regional Transportation Planning Board (TPB) voted to keep Governor Hogan's proposed expansion of I-495 and I-270 with four private toll lanes in the long-range transportation plan. We are very disappointed by this outcome, given the serious flaws in Maryland's study. View our full press release statement here.

This was a re-vote — the TPB previously voted on June 16th to remove the toll lanes from the long-range transportation plan, meaning that the project could not receive federal approval. The changed vote is due in part to a last-minute pivot by Montgomery County Councilmembers Hans Riemer, Andrew Friedson, Nancy Navarro, Gabe Albornoz, and Craig Rice. In the end, Montgomery County Council, Prince George's County Council, and the Prince George's County Executive flipped to support the toll lane expansion, along with the City of Fairfax, City of Alexandria, and Arlington County.

Governor Hogan successfully used strong-arm tactics to threaten local officials with cuts to other projects (even though he wasn't funding many of these as it is!) and by promising Montgomery County to fund the design (not construction) of local transit projects, such as the Corridor Cities Transitway and MD-355 bus rapid transit projects. While these are important transit projects, there is no commitment to fund construction, and it's not worth taking one step forward on transportation while also taking a huge step backward.

To be clear, we agree that we need to address the Beltway and I-270, but the process has been distorted from the beginning because of the power of the toll road companies and Governor Hogan starting with the conclusion first and failing to objectively consider alternatives.

Evaluation of alternatives is particularly important because the highway expansion will harm hundreds of acres of parkland, wetlands, and waterways, as well as lead to more noise, air pollution, stormwater runoff, and greenhouse gas emissions.

But this isn't the end of the fight.

The next decision point is at Maryland's three-person Board of Public Works, where Comptroller Peter Franchot is the key swing vote. The vote on the project's predevelopment contract is likely to take place either at the end of this month or in early August — before the final environmental impact statement has been completed.

Email Maryland's Board of Public Works today!

If the pre-development agreement is approved, the state will be on the hook to reimburse the private project developers up to $50 million taxpayer dollars if the project does not receive federal approval or is canceled for other reasons.

We believe that good government demands that members of the Board of Public Works and the public should know the full fiscal, environmental, and social risks of this project by completing the environmental impact study before the BPW votes — certainly before locking Maryland into a long-term, exclusive contract.

This project isn't worth the high cost to parks, streams, neighborhoods, taxpayers, and drivers. Instead of investing in transit-oriented communities — especially in Prince George’s County — it condemns residents of the east side of our region to forever having more costly, long commutes. Read more in CSG's executive director's op-ed in the Baltimore Sun.

In conclusion, use this form to tell the Maryland Board of Public Works to reject the predevelopment agreement and go back to the drawing board for more sustainable solutions!

Thanks for all you do,

Jane Lyons

Maryland Advocacy Manager

Coalition for Smarter Growth

Day of Reckoning Arrives at the TPB

MDOT’s Threat to Take Away Transportation Project Funding the State Never Promised

The National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) is the transportation planning organization for the Washington, D.C. region and is federally mandated to produce a long-range transportation plan.

At its June 16 meeting, the TPB voted to remove the I-495/I-270 P3 project from the plan and the air quality conformity analysis required by the Clean Air Act. This was a significant setback for the public private partnership (P3) toll lane project since a project must be part of a region’s long-range plan and conformity analysis before it can secure federal environmental approval.

If the TPB’s decision to remove the project from the long-range plan is not reversed, the project cannot move forward.

Project backers have scrambled to salvage the P3 project. A motion to reconsider and reverse the TPB’s decision, and restore the project to the region’s long-range plan is on the agenda for the next TPB meeting on July 21. Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) Deputy Secretary Earl Lewis is trying to persuade TPB members who voted against the I-495/I-270 P3 project, or who abstained, to change their votes and support the P3 project, or see other transportation projects in the long-range plan that they want, defunded (see his letter here).

Delegate Marc Korman, Chair of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Environment and Transportation, reviewed the list of projects that MDOT is threatening to defund.

He determined that almost all of these projects lack State funding commitments, are not in the State’s six-year capital program for transportation, the Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP), and are not planned for funding. Read the analysis on Twitter or as a PDF.

Action Item: Urge Our TPB Members to Stand Firm

Write today to TPBcomment@mwcog.org (Attn: Chairman Allen). Explain in your own words why the TPB should stand by its vote to remove the I-495/I-270 toll lane P3 project from the regional plan. An email to this address will be circulated to all TPB members. Your email needs to be sent out as soon as possible. The meeting and re-vote will be Wednesday, July 21.

The June TPB vote to remove the toll-lane project from the National Capital Region’s Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) could have ended the fatally flawed toll lane P3 scheme. But the Governor and MDOT are demanding a re-vote and applying enormous pressure on local and State elected and appointed officials who serve on the TPB to change their votes and keep the project alive.

Your emails and letters have been powerful and have had significant impact. Our elected and appointed officials represent us on the TPB. This will be a very important vote for the TPB. It will either be a vote to preserve the integrity of the transportation planning process, or it will be a surrender to political pressure. Please keep the pressure on your elected and appointed officials to stop this ill-conceived project.

We cannot let coercion and misinformation smother the defects of this misguided scheme. We know that while the cost of driving in the toll lanes will steadily increase over the next 50 years, there will be no relief from congestion in the so-called free lanes. Traffic gridlock and bottlenecks will get worse. We know the project will harm our health, homes, communities, and environment.

Testimonies at the Maryland Transportation Authority Hearings

The Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) Board voted to advance the predevelopment design contract (the Phase 1 P3 Agreement) for the toll lane project. MDTA is responsible for setting toll rates and managing toll collections. By law, the public must have the opportunity to comment on proposed toll rate ranges. Hearings were held on July 12 and 14.

Testimonies against the project and the exorbitant toll rates proposed by MDTA can be found at https://dontwiden270.org/mdta-hearing.

Special Saturday Edition: Sign Up Now to Raise Your Voice About Toll Rates!

You don’t have to be an expert to testify at next week’s toll-setting hearings! Everything you need to know is below, including plenty of talking points you can make your own. The more of us who show up and speak up or call in, the stronger the message to MDOT!

 

The Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA) is rushing to approve a predevelopment design contract (the Phase 1 P3 Agreement) for the toll lane project. Transurban is the Australian company awarded the initial one-year $50 million predevelopment contract and has the exclusive right to build toll lanes from the George Washington Parkway to I-70 in Frederick -- a $6 billion contract.

 

The Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA) Board voted on June 8 to advance the predevelopment agreement, including holding public hearings. MDTA is an independent agency under MDOT and is responsible for setting toll rates and managing toll collections. As required by law, the public must have the opportunity to comment on the proposed toll rate ranges. It is vital that you participate in this process. The most effective way to make your voice heard is to testify in person on July 12. However, if you can’t testify in person, it is important that you call in on July 14th and give a brief (less than 3 minute) testimony by phone. Note, as indicated below:  you must pre-register in order to be admitted to the phone queue.

 

More information can be found in this excellent article:

 

Action Item

Participate in the Public Hearings for Proposed HOT Lane Toll Rate Ranges

  • In-person testimony:  July 12 from 2 to 4 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. at the Hilton Washington D.C./Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting Center (just off Rockville Pike near the Twinbrook Metro). You must register in advance.  Click here to register or call 888-725-0174. Members of the public will be allotted three minutes. 

  • Call-in testimony:  July 14 from 2 to 4 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. Provide one-on-one testimony during the call-in hearing sessions. You must register here and provide your phone number. On the 14th, you will call 855-701-1977 and leave a voicemail message limited to 3 minutes.

 

Suggested Talking Points

The MDTA hearings concern the toll rates and your presentation should focus on the high tolls and how these will be unaffordable for most people. The following bullets are some suggested discussion points. Use these and other concerns about the toll rates but state them in your own words and stay within the 3 minute time frame. Be sure to include your name and city of residence.

  • Privatizing roadways can lead to significant control of regional transportation by private companies accountable to their shareholders rather than the public. The tolls on the proposed I-495 and I-270 Public-Private Partnership (P3) express toll lanes will deliberately be set high to guarantee profits for toll company shareholders. The private toll operators have a strong incentive to make congestion on the free lanes as bad as possible, so that people will pay their high tolls.

  • Toll rates will be too high for average drivers on a daily basis. The 2021 toll rate for a passenger vehicle with an E-Z Pass on the I-270 portion will be a maximum of $3.76/mile, varying with the traffic conditions so that the toll is highest when you most need to use the toll lanes. Video tolling rates for those without an E-Z Pass would range as high as $5.64/mile. That means the toll from the bridge to I-370 could be over $40 at peak times!

  • Actual toll rates will be higher when the road is operating. The toll rate ranges will continue to escalate every year for the 50 years of the contract at a rate that will be 2.1% per year faster than inflation.

  • High price toll roads are inequitable. This plan turns public land over to private investors to give a huge benefit to wealthy people. Wealthy people will be able to take the HOT lanes whenever they want while making congestion worse for people in the regular lanes. 

  • Expensive toll roads are a regressive form of taxation in which low-income drivers may spend a larger percentage of their income on tolls than high-income drivers. Maximum toll rates should be accessible to working class families.

  • The proposed project is financially risky and does not show good stewardship of Maryland’s financial well-being. The more expensive the project, the higher the tolls have to be to cover the costs. The cost of building the express lanes is based on assumptions and projections that no longer apply and the cost of building the express lanes is unknown.

  • Congestion must be maintained on the free lanes to get people to pay to use expensive managed lanes. The bulk of revenue from express toll lanes needs to be collected at rush hour and it is unclear how teleworking will affect rush hour traffic.